Peptides AcademyEditorial Policy & Methodology
How we source, review, and grade the information on this site. Short version: every clinical claim traces to a primary peer-reviewed source, we publish the methodology behind our Evidence Score openly, and we sell no peptides.
Primary-source first
Every clinical claim links to a peer-reviewed publication, trial registry entry, or regulatory document (FDA/EMA/MHRA). Sources are listed on each peptide page with DOI and PMID.
No affiliate influence on reviews
We do not sell peptides. Research-peptide suppliers never appear in our reviews with paid placement. Some supplement and cosmetic-peptide links (collagen, Matrixyl, Argireline, supplies) go to Amazon with an affiliate tag. This never changes editorial coverage or scoring.
Transparent grading
The Evidence Score on peptide pages is calculated from a published 4-factor formula. You can audit the inputs and see why a peptide scored where it did.
Second-pass review
Pages with clinical claims are reviewed by a Clinical Research Review Board separate from the editorial team. Review dates are recorded per article.
Jurisdictional honesty
Regulatory status is disclosed per peptide, per jurisdiction. Research-only peptides are labeled as such. We do not obscure legal status.
Correction policy
Errors are corrected publicly and dated. Material changes trigger an updatedAt field and a changelog note at the bottom of the affected page.
How we grade evidence
Each peptide receives a 0–100 Evidence Score composed of four 25-point factors. The score is visible on each peptide page and the inputs are auditable.
| Factor | Max | What earns points |
|---|---|---|
| Human trials | 25 | Phase 3 or large phase 2 trials → 20-25. Small phase 2 / early human data → 5-15. No human trials → 0-5. |
| Replicated preclinical | 25 | Multiple independent animal or in-vitro studies replicating effect → 20-25. Single-lab findings → 5-15. Purely theoretical → 0-5. |
| Safety data | 25 | Long-duration human safety dataset → 20-25. Limited human + animal safety → 10-15. Unknown → 0-5. |
| Mechanism clarity | 25 | Receptor fully characterized, downstream cascade documented → 20-25. Partial mechanism known → 10-15. Speculative → 0-5. |
Scores are recalculated when major trial data publishes. A full changelog is maintained.
Clinical Research Review Board
Pages containing clinical claims are reviewed by credentialed professionals in pharmacology, endocrinology, or clinical medicine. Reviewers operate independently of the editorial team and receive no compensation tied to the content of what they review.
- Review process: pre-publication fact-check + annual recurrence review.
- Reviewer conflicts of interest are disclosed on bylined pages.
- Reviewers may request factual changes; they do not set editorial stance.
What we don't do
- We do not sell peptides, prescription drugs, or research chemicals.
- We do not take affiliate commissions from research-peptide suppliers or compounding pharmacies.
- We do not accept paid placements in supplier reviews, tier lists, or comparisons.
- We do link to Amazon for supplements, cosmetic peptides, and injection supplies using an affiliate tag. These commissions do not influence editorial coverage or Evidence Score values.
- We do not withhold negative findings. Low Evidence Scores are assigned to peptides whose vendors might otherwise pay for placement (they don't, because we don't accept payment).
- We do not provide medical advice. Content is educational. Clinical decisions belong to you and a qualified medical professional.
Medical & Research Disclaimer
Content on Peptides Academy is for educational purposes. Many peptides discussed are classified as research-use-only in most jurisdictions and are not approved for human self-administration. Self-administering research peptides carries real risks, including sterility, dosing, and systemic effects that are not fully characterized. Always consult a qualified medical professional before any peptide use.
Corrections & editorial contact
Spotted an error? Have a source we missed? Email [email protected] with specifics. Meaningful corrections are published with the date and reason.